Transvaginal volumetry of first trimester gestational sac: A comparison ofconventional with three-dimensional ultrasound

Citation
T. Muller et al., Transvaginal volumetry of first trimester gestational sac: A comparison ofconventional with three-dimensional ultrasound, J PERIN MED, 28(3), 2000, pp. 214-220
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
03005577 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
214 - 220
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-5577(2000)28:3<214:TVOFTG>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether three-dimensional (3D) ultra sound is superior to two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound in evaluating first tr imester gestational sac volume (GSV). 130 mainly low risk pregnancies betwe en 5 and 12 weeks gestation were prospectively investigated. The 2D volumet ry of GSV was performed using the ellipsoid formula; the 3D volumetry was c arried out in all three planes using the contour mode and the volume from t he measured circumferences and the distances between them were computed by a software. The data were analysed by variance and regression. The mean GSV increased from 1.5 +/- 2 mi with 5 weeks to 127 +/- 27 mi with 12 weeks (3 D, longitudinal plane). The standard deviation of measured GSV increased wi th gestational age (GA) and GSV, and was more evident using 2D than 3D volu metry. GSV of pregnancies with similar GA differed considerably and viable pregnancies followed by miscarriage did not show different GSV. We conclude , that 3D volumetry of first trimester GSV is superior to 2D volumetry in i ts estimation, but seems to be without a prognostic significance for gestat ional outcome.