Sj. Gregory et al., Gonadotroph-lactotroph associations and expression of prolactin receptors in the equine pituitary gland throughout the seasonal reproductive cycle, J REPR FERT, 119(2), 2000, pp. 223-231
An interaction between gonadotroph and lactotroph cells of the pituitary gl
and has long been recognized in several species. The current study was cond
ucted to investigate whether an association between gonadotrophs and lactot
rophs occurs in mares and whether prolactin receptors are expressed within
the pituitary gland of this species. The effects of both reproductive state
and season on these variables were examined in pituitary glands obtained f
rom sexually active mares in July (breeding season), sexually active mares
in November (non-breeding season) and anoestrous mares in November. Pituita
ries were dissected out immediately after death and immunofluorescent stain
ing was carried out on 6 mu m sections using specific antibodies to the LH
beta subunit, FSH beta subunit, prolactin and prolactin receptor. Gonadotro
phs were observed in both the pars distalis and pars tuberalis; although th
ey appeared mostly as isolated cells, small groups of gonadotrophs were als
o identified in the pars distalis. In contrast, lactotrophs were observed o
nly as clusters of cells exclusively in the pars distalis of sexually activ
e and anoestrous mares in November and in most of the sexually active mares
in July. A specific gonadotroph-lactotroph association was identified only
between large isolated gonadotrophs and lactotroph clusters. Double immuno
fluorescent staining for FSH beta and prolactin revealed a similar gonadotr
oph-lactotroph association to the one detected for LH gonadotrophs. No stat
istical difference in the gonadotroph:lactotroph ratio was observed as a re
sult of changes in reproductive status or season. However, a tendency for a
simultaneous decrease in the number of gonadotrophs and an increase in the
number of lactotrophs was detected in anoestrous animals. Prolactin recept
or immunoreactivity was found in the pars distalis, but not in the pars tub
eralis, of sexually active (July and November) and anoestrous animals for b
oth long and short forms of the receptor. No prolactin receptor co-localiza
tion for either form of the receptor was observed in LH or FSH gonadotrophs
in either of the reproductive states examined during both summer and winte
r seasons. Furthermore, no significant difference was apparent in the propo
rtion of cells expressing prolactin receptors between mares of different re
productive state or season. The specific anatomical association between gon
adotroph and lactotroph cells and the expression of prolactin receptors in
the equine pituitary gland indicate a potential role of prolactin in the re
gulation of gonadotrophin secretion. However, the absence of evidence for c
o-localization of prolactin receptors in LH or FSH cells does not support t
he hypothesis of a direct effect of prolactin on the gonadotroph as reporte
d in a short day breeder. The results raise the possibility that, in horses
, an intermediate regulatory cell may mediate the action of prolactin on go
nadotroph function.