We compared patterns of vigilance behavior in a male- and a female-dom
inant species-white-faced capuchins and ring-tailed lemurs-and used th
e results to test four hypotheses to explain vigilance behavior in pri
mates. Adult male white-faced capuchins spent significantly more time
vigilant than females did, and much male vigilance appeared to be dire
cted toward males from other social groups. This finding supports the
protection of paternity hypothesis. No sex difference existed in vigil
ance behavior among the ring-railed lemurs, and subjects of both sexes
exhibited more vigilance toward predators/potential predators than to
ward extragroup conspecifics, which supports the predator detection hy
pothesis. A trade-off argument, suggesting that females tolerate males
in a group in return for greater male vigilance, does not apply to ri
ng-tailed lemurs in our study. In both the male-dominant capuchins and
the female-dominant ring-tailed lemurs, the alpha subject in the majo
rity of the study groups was significantly more vigilant than other gr
oup members were. In white-faced capuchins, the alpha male mates more
often than subordinate males do; therefore, the greater degree of vigi
lance exhibited by the alpha male may correspond to the protection of
his reproductive investment. In ring-tailed lemurs, there can be more
than one matriline in a group. Thus, the greater amount of vigilance b
ehavior exhibited by the alpha female may be related to protection of
her matriline, which could ultimately lead to greater inclusive fitnes
s. Alpha subjects in our study groups exhibited certain behaviors more
frequently or exclusively. Accordingly, there may be a constellation
of behaviors characteristic of alpha animals.