Consistent, combined quantitative Auger electron spectroscopy and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy digital databases: Convergence of theory and experiment
Mp. Seah et al., Consistent, combined quantitative Auger electron spectroscopy and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy digital databases: Convergence of theory and experiment, J VAC SCI A, 18(4), 2000, pp. 1083-1088
Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS
) have many aspects in common. Therefore, tests of aspects for one spectros
copy, applicable to the other, should be validated for both. Digital databa
ses of elemental spectra for both AES and XPS have thus been measured using
an electron spectrometer that has been fully calibrated for its intensity
and energy axes. These databases of true spectra give absolute Auger electr
on yields and relative photoelectron yields. The AES data are measured for
both 5 and 10 keV electron beam energies, whereas the XPS data are measured
for both Al and Mg unmonochromated x rays at the magic angle. In addition
to these we have measured reflected electron energy loss spectroscopy (REEL
S) data to provide a third database. The combination of these databases all
ows a refinement of the theories to obtain an overall convergence between t
heory and experiment. Improvements to the theory have been obtained by iden
tifying three classes of parameter, those (i) for both AES and XPS, such as
electron transport, the methodology of evaluation of peak areas, and the s
pectrometer response function, (ii) for AES only, such as the electron ioni
zation cross section, backscattering, and specific electron backgrounds, an
d (iii) for XPS only, such as the photon-ionization cross section. Addition
ally, the use of REELS data for background subtraction seems significantly
better than the use of any one single Tougaard universal cross section in t
he determination of the AES and XPS intensities in the databases. The forma
lism for quantitative analysis in AES and XPS, using relative sensitivity f
actors, has been revised to develop an accurate matrix-less formalism that
is very simple for use by the analyst. This formalism, involving "average m
atrix sensitivity factors" rather than "pure element sensitivity factors,"
has the same accuracy as the matrix formalism but its simplicity permits re
ady extension to systems beyond binary. [S0734-2101(00)08704-2].