BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to conduct a clinical-epidemiological
and microbiological investigation into an outbreak of food-borne disease d
ue to the consumption of oysters.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A historic cohort study was conducted into the consum
ption of 15 food items and clinical symptoms. The influence of each foodstu
ff was assessed by Mantel-Haenzel stratified relative risk (RRM-H) at 95% c
onfidence intervals, and was confirmed by dose-response analysis with a chi
(2) test tendency. We investigated sample stools from 5 patients and 2 food
-handlers.
Results: The overall attack rate was 38.0% (19/50). The median period of in
cubation was 39.0 h (maxim 62 and minimum 3 h). The symptoms were: fever 17
.6% (3/17), diarrhoea 57.9% (11/19), vomits 84.2% (16/19), nausea 89.5% (17
/19) and abdominal pain 89.5% (17/19). In stratified analysis, the Mantel-H
aenzel method revealed a statistically risk for oysters (RRM-H = 3.3; IC 95
%: 1.1-8.7), while the RRM-H value for sea snails was not significant (RRM-
H = 2.8; IC 95%: 0.9-41.1). For oyster consumption, the dose-response test
was statistically significant (p = 0.005). Examination by electron microsco
py revealed small round structured Viruses compatible with Norwalk-like vir
us. The oyster contamination was reported to the public health authority.
CONCLUSIONS: This research highlights the usefulness of dose-response analy
sis in presenting epidemiological evidence, reveals the potential role of o
yster consumption in food-borne disease such us Norwalk-like virus and shaw
the need for monitoring production centres and oyster beds in order to pre
vent further cases of contamination.