J. Ocvirk et al., Serum values of tumour necrosis factor-alpha and of soluble tumour necrosis factor-R55 in melanoma patients, MELANOMA RE, 10(3), 2000, pp. 253-258
Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) is a cytokine with a variety of bi
ological activities, including an effect on tumour growth. The soluble TNF
receptor TNF-R55 (sTNF-R55) inhibits TNF alpha functioning. Serum values of
TNF alpha and TNF-R55 have been observed in patients with different cancer
s. To determine the serum values of TNF alpha and its soluble receptors and
to investigate the prognostic value of sTNF-R55, we studied the sera of 68
patients with metastatic melanoma, 109 patients with no recurrent disease
after surgical removal of melanoma, and 69 healthy controls. At least four
different monoclonal antibodies against human TNF alpha and human TNF-R55,
respectively, were prepared to obtain sensitive and reliable sandwich enzym
e-linked immunosorbent assays. We found that in patients with metastatic me
lanoma the serum values of sTNF-R55 were significantly higher (2.41 ng/ml;
range 0.02-23.0 ng/ml; P < 0.05) than in the melanoma patients without recu
rrence (0.54 ng/ml; range 0.02-6.25 ng/ml) and healthy controls (0.5 ng/ml;
range 0.02-5.0 ng/ml). The sTNF-R55 concentrations increased as the diseas
e progressed. Patients with metastatic melanoma also had significantly high
er concentrations of TNF alpha (3.34 ng/ml; range 0.03-30.0 ng/ml; P < 0.05
) than patients without recurrence (1.24 ng/ml; range 0.02-23.0 ng/ml). Pat
ients with metastatic melanoma, a high sTNF-R55 concentration, a low TNF al
pha concentration and a low TNF : sTNF-R55 ratio had the worst prognosis. L
ow values of sTNF-R55 (< 0.6 ng/ml) were associated with favourable respons
e to chemotherapy (P = 0.007). According to our findings, patients with met
astatic melanoma have higher values of sTNF-R55 than the controls and melan
oma patients without recurrence. sTNF-R55 values higher than 0.6 ng/ml and
a TNF:sTNF-R55 ratio lower than 1.5 are unfavourable prognostic factors for
response to chemotherapy. (C) 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.