It has been claimed that the lack of a reliable confidence-accuracy relatio
n in eyewitness memory stems from eyewitnesses' lack of knowledge concernin
g their relative expertise. Two studies tested this idea by contrasting the
effects of practice alone with practice with feedback in three successive
eyewitness tests. Experiment 1 tested recall for events, and Experiment 2 u
sed recognition of faces as test materials. Both studies showed that practi
ce alone did not increase the confidence-accuracy relation, but practice wi
th feedback on relative performance produced robust increases in the confid
ence-accuracy relation. This suggests that lack of calibration is one facto
r that causes the reported lack of association between confidence and accur
acy for eyewitness memory.