This paper addresses certain issues relating to the viability of contrarota
ting (CR) electric drive for attack submarines. Topics include CR propulsio
n's potential benefits, electric drive advantages, and combining contrarota
tion with electric drive engine room concepts. CR propellers provide propul
sive coefficient (PC) increases compared to open-type and performance-enhan
ced single propellers. The maximum submarine propulsion plant power capacit
y could therefore be reduced with this PC increase, potentially resulting i
n a smaller, lighter propulsion plant This paper concludes, however, that c
ontrarotation shows no propulsion plant weight savings against electric dri
ve attack submarines with performance enhanced single propeller designs. We
ight improvements in the power generation plant and certain steam plant and
electric plant systems are offset by weight increases from the additional
shafting and bearing requirements for the CR shaft. Contrarotation is curre
ntly more advantageous for nonnuclear ships, where significant fuel savings
are achievable with its higher PC.