M. Gopalakrishnan et al., MAXIMIZING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SYSTEM - AN ADAPTIVE MODELING APPROACH, Management science, 43(6), 1997, pp. 827-840
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Management,"Operatione Research & Management Science","Operatione Research & Management Science
The dynamic nature of an operating environment, such as machine utiliz
ation and breakdown frequency results in changing preventive maintenan
ce (PM) needs for manufacturing equipment. In this paper, we present a
n approach to generate an adaptive PM schedule which maximizes the net
savings from PM subject to workforce constraints. The approach consis
ts of two components: (a) task prioritization based on a multi-legit r
egression model for each type of PM task, and (b) task rescheduling ba
sed on a binary integer programming (BIP) model with constraints on si
ngle-skilled and multi-skilled workforce availability. The task priori
tization component develops a multi-legit regression for machine failu
re probability associated with each type of PM task at the beginning o
f the year, using historical data on machine utilization, PM, and mach
ine breakdowns. At the start of each PM time-bucket (e.g., a month), w
e use the updated machine failure probability for each candidate PM ta
sk to compute its current contribution to net PM savings, which indica
tes its current priority. The task rescheduling BIP model incorporates
the priorities in selecting tasks for the current bucket to maximize
PM effectiveness subject to workforce availability, yielding an adapti
ve and effective PM schedule for each time-bucket of the master PM sch
edule. We examine the effect of using multi-skilled workforce on the o
verall PM effectiveness, and also provide an illustration from a newsp
aper publishing environment to explain the use of the approach. We hav
e developed four heuristic algorithms to yield good solutions to large
scale versions of this scheduling problem. The heuristics perform ext
remely well, and the best heuristic solution is within 1.4% of optimal
ity on an average.