Use of implicitly defined optical surfaces for the design of imaging and illumination systems

Citation
Sa. Lerner et Jm. Sasian, Use of implicitly defined optical surfaces for the design of imaging and illumination systems, OPT ENG, 39(7), 2000, pp. 1796-1801
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Apllied Physucs/Condensed Matter/Materiales Science","Optics & Acoustics
Journal title
OPTICAL ENGINEERING
ISSN journal
00913286 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1796 - 1801
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-3286(200007)39:7<1796:UOIDOS>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
This paper presents an approach that uses implicitly defined optical surfac es for designing imaging and illumination systems. In the standard aspheric optical surface, consisting of a conic with an even-order polynomial, the surface sagitta (sag), z, is defined explicitly as a function of the coordi nates x and y. This standard aspheric surface is deemed useful for describi ng surfaces with small departures from a conic surface. However, optical su rfaces with large departures from a conic are sometimes useful for current applications, such as null certification, conformal domes and windows, lumi naires, and condenser design. The approach in this paper, which uses implic itly defined surfaces to describe highly aspheric surfaces, can be more gen eral and easier to use for some situations. The sag z of an implicit surfac e is not defined directly, as it is in an explicit surface, instead, it is defined indirectly in a more general form, as a function of x, y, and z. Be cause implicit functions have a more general form than explicit functions, they can better describe a variety of surfaces that cannot be easily descri bed using the standard explicit aspheric surface. We show some examples of current interest. (C) 2000 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Enginee rs. [S0091-3286(00)00307-X].