Objective. To evaluate the difference in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disk
position between reducible and permanently displaced disks.
Study design. We found 182 joints with disk displacement (83 with reduction
and 99 without reduction) that were available for the study. The disk posi
tion was estimated by using magnetic resonance imaging.
Results. There was a statistically significant difference between them with
the permanently displaced disks being located more anteriorly. When a comp
arison was made in the disks as to which degree of displacement was moderat
e, a difference of disk position at either the medial or lateral depth of t
he TMJ was observed.
Conclusion. It was suggested that the permanently displaced disks are locat
ed more anteriorly than the reducible displaced disks. When the disk displa
cement was moderate, disk reduction was influenced by less disk displacemen
t at either the medial or lateral part of the TMJ.