Sakalava fishermen and Madagascar Fish Eagles: enhancing traditional conservation rules to control resource abuse that threatens a key breeding area for an endangered eagle

Citation
Rt. Watson et R. Rabarisoa, Sakalava fishermen and Madagascar Fish Eagles: enhancing traditional conservation rules to control resource abuse that threatens a key breeding area for an endangered eagle, OSTRICH, 71(1-2), 2000, pp. 2-10
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
OSTRICH
ISSN journal
00306525 → ACNP
Volume
71
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2 - 10
Database
ISI
SICI code
0030-6525(200003)71:1-2<2:SFAMFE>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Survival of the Madagascar Fish Eagle is threatened by human persecution an d habitat loss. Of a global Madagascar Fish Eagle population estimated at 1 00 breeding pairs, the single most important concentration often pairs bree ds on three adjacent lakes near the southern end of the species' range alon g the western seaboard of Madagascar. Fishing on the lakes is the main live lihood of local Sakalava tribes people who have harmoniously shared these i mportant wetlands with fish eagles for centuries. In the last five years Pe regrine Fund researchers have documented a massive influx of up to 275 seas onal migrant. fishermen who abuse local traditional resource extraction rul es. The economic incentive to endure the hardship of migration to the lakes and camping on the lakeshore for the season is strong. In 1995 per-capita inco me from fishing was about $1 500 for the six month season, 7.5 times the na tional annual average. Fish stocks were rapidly diminished through the fish ing season as catches diminished to the point where fishermen gave up fishi ng before the end of the season. The resilience of introduced Tilapia sp. h as so far ensured that stocks rebounded between fishing seasons. Fish stock s were at their lowest when Madagascar Fish Eagle nestlings fledged. The most serious impact of fishermen may be on the lake-side forest, which was used as a source of dugout canoes and wood to fuel fish-drying fires. U p to 275 trees were cut for canoes in 1995 and up to 90 wood fires burned f or a total of about 111 500 hours to dry a catch of almost 6.9 million fish . To conserve this important breeding site we aim to prevent loss of fish e agle nesting habitat, increased nest site disturbance, and reduced prey ava ilability by working with community members and local leaders to enforce tr aditional resource use rules and find alternatives to unsustainable forms o f resource extraction.