Clinical efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate 1 mg twice daily administered via a HFA 134a pressurized metered dose inhaler to patients withsevere asthma

Citation
Jg. Ayres et al., Clinical efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate 1 mg twice daily administered via a HFA 134a pressurized metered dose inhaler to patients withsevere asthma, RESP MED, 94, 2000, pp. S42-S50
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","da verificare
Journal title
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
09546111 → ACNP
Volume
94
Year of publication
2000
Supplement
B
Pages
S42 - S50
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-6111(200006)94:<S42:CEASOF>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
A randomized, double-blind, cross-over study was conducted to assess the ef ficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate 1 mg twice daily administered v ia a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) containing the new non-chlorof luorocarbon (CFC) propellant (HFA 134a), or the established CFC propellants 11 and 12 in patients with severe asthma. The study comprised a 2-week run -in period followed by two 6-week treatment periods, with no washout period in between. One hundred and nineteen symptomatic adult patients with sever e asthma, who were receiving inhaled beclomethasone 2-4 mg day(-1) or equiv alent, were randomized to treatment. Patients were randomized to one of two sequence groups (sequence 1: HFA 134 a pMDI then CFC pMDI or sequence 2: CF% pMDI then HFA 134a pMDI). The seque nce groups differed with respect to mean peak expiratory flow (PEF) at base line; however, the magnitude of the increase in PEF from baseline during tr eatment was similar in the two sequence groups. Mean PEF at baseline was 33 41 min(-1) in sequence group 1 (HFA 134a-->CFC pMDI) and this increased to 3571 min(-1) and 3661 min(-1) during treatment with the HFA 134a and CFC pM DI, respectively. In sequence group 2 (CFC-->HFA 134a pMDI) mean PEF at bas eline was 2971 min(-1) and this increased to 3361 min(-1) and 3281 min(-1) during treatment with the HFA 134a and CFC pMDI, respectively. Based on an overall analysis of the two treatment groups at week 6, equivalence was dem onstrated; the mean treatment difference (HFA 134a-CFC pMDI) in morning PEF was 01 min(-1) (90% confidence interval (CI), for difference between group s: - 7, 61 min(-1)). There was a comparable improvement in secondary effica cy variables, including clinic lung function measurements, in the two treat ment groups. The incidence and type of most adverse events were similar in the two treatment groups. There was no difference in the adjusted geometric mean morning serum cortisol levels after treatment with the HFA 134a and C FC MDI. Therefore, the fluticasone propionate HFA 134a pMDI constitutes a s uitable replacement for the established CFC pMDI at a microgram equivalent dose.