Aim: The replacement of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) by hydrofluoroalkane has t
he potential to improve airway deposition of BDP. We investigated whether H
FA-BDP extra-fine solution aerosol 400 mu g day(-1) is as effective as CFC-
BDP 1000 mu g day(-1) in patients with stable, moderate asthma, having pers
istent bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
Patients and Methods: One hundred and fifty patients with moderate asthma f
rom 20 centres, on inhaled steroids for less than or equal to 3 months, ent
ered a 4-week run-in period with 1000 mu g day(-1) CFC-BDP. Patients were t
hen allocated to a 10-week study phase, receiving CFC-BDP 1000 mu g day(-1)
or HFA-BDP 400 mu g day(-1). Symptom score and PEF were measured daily and
recorded as biweekly means. Spirometry, PC20FEV1, blood eosinophils and se
rum ECP were determined on days 15, 29, 43 and 71, and compared to the last
visit of the run-in period. All group members were trained in a quality co
ntrol centre.
Results: Treating the population of the HFA-BDP group (n = 72) and the CFC-
BDP group (n = 78) did not show significant differences in terms of symptom
s, lung function, airway hyperresponsiveness and serum markers of inflammat
ion at the end of the run-in period and the end of the study phase.
Conclusion: Using HFA instead of a CFC metered dose inhaler, containing les
s than half the daily dose of BDP, allows control of symptoms and lung func
tion parameters, without changes in bronchial hyperresponsiveness.