T. Kriebel et al., Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children: curative treatment by radiofrequency catheter ablation, Z KARDIOL, 89(6), 2000, pp. 538-545
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is one of
the most common forms of supraventricular tachycardia in the pediatric popu
lation.
Patients and methods: 41 children with a mean age of 9.6 (3.7-16) years wit
h recurrent atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) refractory
to medical treatment (n=38) and recurrent syncope (n=3) underwent electrop
hysiologic (EP) study. In all patients dual AV-nodal physiology could be de
monstrated during EP study and typical form of AVNRT (mean heart rate 220/m
in) could be induced by programmed atrial stimulation. A steerable 7 F abla
tion catheter was placed at the inferoparaseptal region of the tricupid val
ve annulus close to the orifice of the coronary sinus with the intention to
record a late fractionated local atrial electrogram during sinus rhythm. S
tarting at this point radiofrequency current (500 M-Iz) with a target tempe
rature of 70 degrees C was delivered with the intention to ablate the slow
pathway. If a slowly accelerated junctional rhythm (<120/min) occurred duri
ng energy discharge, programmed atrial stimulation was repeated. Otherwise
radiofrequency current was delivered step by step up to a septal position n
ext to the tricuspid valve annulus. Slow pathway ablation was defined as la
ck of evidence of dual AV nodal pathways during repeated atrial stimulation
. Slow pathway modulation was defined as maximal one atrial echoimpulse aft
er ablation.
Results: The number of energy applications ranged from 1-19 (median 6). In
35/41 patients slow pathway ablation could be achieved: in six patients the
slow pathway was modulated. In none of the patients permanent high grade A
V block was observed. During followup (mean 4.1 years) two patients had a r
ecurrent episode of AVNRT after slow pathway modulation. All other patients
are still free of AVNRT without medical treatment.
Conclusion: Selective radiofrequency current ablation/modulation of the slo
w pathway is a safe and curative treatment of AVNRT in young patients.