The benefit of a single-leg strength training program for the muscles around the untrained ankle - A prospective, randomized, controlled study

Citation
Bs. Uh et al., The benefit of a single-leg strength training program for the muscles around the untrained ankle - A prospective, randomized, controlled study, AM J SP MED, 28(4), 2000, pp. 568-573
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
ISSN journal
03635465 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
568 - 573
Database
ISI
SICI code
0363-5465(200007/08)28:4<568:TBOASS>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Severe ankle injuries can require extended periods of immobilization that a dversely affect the strength of the ankle muscles. We have investigated a s ingle-leg strength training program of the muscles surrounding the ankle to determine if it produces a crossover benefit for the contralateral ankle m uscles. Twenty subjects without any history of ankle injuries were randomly divided into a control and a training group. Both groups underwent isokine tic testing of the ankle muscles at the beginning and end of an 8-week peri od. The control group maintained normal activities between the tests. Half of the training group trained the dominant leg only and the other half trai ned the nondominant leg only for the 8-week period, three times per week. T he subjects who trained the dominant leg improved peak torque values by 8.5 % in the trained leg and 1.5% in the untrained leg. Similarly, the subjects who trained the nondominant leg improved peak torque values by 9.3% in the trained leg and 3.5% in the untrained leg. In contrast, the control group showed no significant change in peak torque, power, or endurance between th e initial and final tests. With improvements in peak torque as high as 40% in the trained leg and a crossover benefit of 19% in the untrained leg in e ccentric inversion, this strength training technique deserves further inves tigation in an injured population where the benefits may be more substantia l.