A comparison of distilled water and normal saline as diluents for endobronchial administration of epinephrine in the dog

Citation
K. Naganobu et al., A comparison of distilled water and normal saline as diluents for endobronchial administration of epinephrine in the dog, ANESTH ANAL, 91(2), 2000, pp. 317-321
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
ISSN journal
00032999 → ACNP
Volume
91
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
317 - 321
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2999(200008)91:2<317:ACODWA>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
We compared the effects of distilled water and normal saline as diluents fo r the endobronchial administration of epinephrine in anesthetized dogs by u sing a crossover design. Six dogs received 2 mL of either normal saline or distilled water into the bronchus, and the other solution was administered 1 wk later. Eight dogs received 0.02 mg/kg epinephrine diluted in either di stilled water (E + water) or normal saline (E + saline) to a total volume o f 2 mt into the bronchus, and the other solution was administered 1 wk late r. Normal saline or distilled water without epinephrine did not affect the plasma epinephrine concentration, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and Pao(2). The peak plasma epinephrine concentration was significantly larger after t reatment with E + water (26.5 +/- 7.9 ng/mL) than after E + saline (2.1 +/- 0.7 ng/mL). E + water caused an increase in MAP of 91 +/- 24 mm Hg, wherea s E + saline did not affect MAP. The maximal decrease in Pao(2) after the a dministration of E + water (14 +/- 5 mm Hg) was significantly greater than after E + saline (7 +/- 2 mm Hg). In conclusion, distilled water as the dil uent for endobronchially administered epinephrine to a total volume of 2 mt allowed better absorption of epinephrine compared with normal saline witho ut a serious detrimental effect on Pao(2).