The efficacy and safety of epidural infusions of levobupivacaine with and without clonidine for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing total hip replacement
Kr. Milligan et al., The efficacy and safety of epidural infusions of levobupivacaine with and without clonidine for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing total hip replacement, ANESTH ANAL, 91(2), 2000, pp. 393-397
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of epidural infusions of levobupi
vacaine, levobupivacaine plus clonidine, and clonidine for postoperative an
algesia in 86 patients undergoing total hip replacement. For each group, an
epidural cannula was inserted before surgery and 15 mL of 0.75% plain levo
bupivacaine was administered. Three hours later, an epidural infusion (6 mL
/h) of levobupivacaine 0.125% (L), levobupivacaine 0.125% plus clonidine 8.
3 mu g/mL (LC) or clonidine alone (8.3 mu g/mL) (C) was initiated. Morphine
consumption was recorded for the following 24 h as were visual analog pain
scores and the degree of sensory and motor blockade. The mean (median) mor
phine consumption was lowest in the combination group (LC),14 (7) mg; highe
r in the clonidine group (C), 23 (21) mg; and highest in the levobupivacain
e group (L), 37 (36) mg (P = 0.022). The median times until the first reque
st for analgesia which were 2.9, 5.9, and 12.5 h for Groups L, C, and LC, r
espectively (P less than or equal to 0.01). There were no statistical diffe
rences among the groups regarding the maximum degree of postoperative motor
blockade. On average, the systolic blood pressure in the two clonidine gro
ups was slightly lower than in those from the levobupivacaine group. We con
clude that the epidural administration of a combination of levobupivacaine
plus clonidine is well tolerated and gives better analgesia than either dru
g used alone.