Ketotifen for asthma in children aged 5 to 15 years: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

Citation
Sk. Kabra et al., Ketotifen for asthma in children aged 5 to 15 years: a randomized placebo-controlled trial, ANN ALLER A, 85(1), 2000, pp. 46-52
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease
Journal title
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
ISSN journal
10811206 → ACNP
Volume
85
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
46 - 52
Database
ISI
SICI code
1081-1206(200007)85:1<46:KFAICA>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Background: The prophylactic agent ketotifen has been studied in mild-to-mo derate asthma. Various trials showed benefit from 10 to 12 weeks of therapy , but no trial in children with followup beyond 12 weeks of the drug is ava ilable. Objectives: We studied the efficacy of ketotifen, 1 mg twice a day, orally as a prophylactic drug in children with asthma. Methods: The double-blind, placebo-controlled trial studied 120 asthmatic c hildren of either sex between the ages of 5 to 15 years at a tertiary care hospital. After an observation period of 4 weeks, children were randomly as signed to receive either ketotifen, 1 mg twice a day, or placebo for 6 mont hs. Antiasthma drugs were continued as required. Main outcome measures incl uded average duration for regular antiasthma drugs, average symptom scores, symptom free days, peak expiratory flow rate, FEV1, and need for emergency room visits. Results: Of the 120 children enrolled, 13 could not complete the trial. Thu s 58 children remained in the treatment group and 49 were in the placebo gr oup. Both groups were comparable in their baseline characteristics. The ave rage number of days that required antiasthma drugs were significantly less in the treatment group: salbutamol (27 +/- 4.7 versus 37 +/- 35 P < .05), t heophylline (37 +/- 4.7 versus 51 +/- 4.8 P < .05), oral steroids (2 +/- 0. 4 versus 5 +/- 1.6 P < .05), and inhalation steroids (18 +/- 2.7 versus 16 +/- 10.8 P < .05). The average symptom scores and symptom free days for cou gh, wheeze, and breathlessness also favored the ketotifen group. Emergency room visits were also significantly lower in the ketotifen group (20 versus 10 P < .05). Statistically significant improvement in all the above parame ters were observed after 14 weeks of therapy. The mean PEFR, FEV1 and side effects of medications were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: Ketotifen, 1 mg twice a day, is an effective prophylaxis for a sthma in children between 5 to 15 years. Significant clinical improvement i s evident after 14 weeks of therapy.