Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic modeling of abacavir (1592U89) from a dose-ranging, double-blind, randomized monotherapy trial with human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects
S. Weller et al., Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic modeling of abacavir (1592U89) from a dose-ranging, double-blind, randomized monotherapy trial with human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects, ANTIM AG CH, 44(8), 2000, pp. 2052-2060
Abacavir (formerly 1592U89) is a carbocyclic nucleoside analog with potent
anti-human immunodeficiency virus (anti HIV) activity when administered alo
ne or in combination with other antiretroviral agents. The population pharm
acokinetics and pharmacodynamics of abacavir were investigated in 41 HIV ty
pe 1 (HIV-1)-infected, antiretroviral naive adults,vith baseline CD4(+) cel
l counts of greater than or equal to 100/mm(3) and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels
of >30,000 copies/ml, Data for analysis were obtained from patients who rec
eived randomized, blinded monotherapy with abacavir at 100, 300, or 600 mg
twice daily (BID) for up to 12 weeks. Plasma abacavir concentrations from s
parse sampling were analyzed by standard population pharmacokinetic methods
, and the effects of dose, combination therapy, gender, weight, and age on
parameter estimates were investigated. Bayesian pharmacokinetic parameter e
stimates were calculated to determine the peak concentration of abacavir in
plasma (C-max) and the area under the concentration-time curve from time z
ero to infinity (AUC(0=infinity)) for individual subjects. The pharmacokine
tics of abacavir were dose proportional over the 100- to 600-mg dose range
and were unaffected by any covariates. No significant correlations were obs
erved between the incidence of the five most common adverse events (headach
e, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and malaise or fatigue) and AUC(0-infinity).
A significant correlation was observed between C-max and nausea by categor
ical analysis (P = 0.019), but this was of borderline significance by logis
tic regression (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 232), Th
e log(10) time averaged AUC(0-infinity) minus baseline (AAUCMB) values for
HIV-1 RNA and CD4+ cell count correlated significantly with C-max and AUC(0
-infinity), but,vith better model fits for AUC(0-infinity), The increase in
AAUCMB values for CD4+ cell count plateaued early for drug exposures that
were associated with little change in AAUCMB values for plasma HIV-1 RNA. T
here was less than a 0.4 log(10) difference over 12 weeks in the HIV-1 RNA
levels with the doubling of the abacavir AUC(0-infinity) from 300 to 600 mg
BID dosing. In conclusion, pharmacodynamic modeling supports the selection
of abacavir 300 mg twice-daily dosing.