Pharmacokinetics of single-dose oral stavudine in subjects with renal impairment and in subjects requiring hemodialysis

Citation
Dm. Grasela et al., Pharmacokinetics of single-dose oral stavudine in subjects with renal impairment and in subjects requiring hemodialysis, ANTIM AG CH, 44(8), 2000, pp. 2149-2153
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
ISSN journal
00664804 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2149 - 2153
Database
ISI
SICI code
0066-4804(200008)44:8<2149:POSOSI>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Two open-label studies assessed the pharmacokinetics of single orally admin istered doses of 30 mg of stavudine in subjects with renal impairment. In o ne study (study I), 15 subjects with selected degrees of renal impairment, but not requiring hemodialysis, were stratified into three groups of five s ubjects each according to creatinine clearance (CLCR) normalized by body su rface area (ml/min/1.73 m(2)): mild (CLCR, 60 to 80), moderate (30 to 50), and severe (less than or equal to 20) renal impairment. Five healthy subjec ts (CLCR greater than or equal to 90) were also enrolled. The stavudine are a under the curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) increased nonlinea rly with declining renal function: 1,863, 2,215, 3,609, and 5,928 ng . h/ml for normal renal function and for mild, moderate, and severe renal impairm ent, respectively (P = 0.0001 between renal impairment groups). The followi ng stavudine dosage recommendations for renal impairment were proposed for subjects weighing greater than or equal to 60 kg: CLCR of >50 ml/min/1.73 m (2), 40 mg every 12 h; CLCR of 21 to 50 ml/min/1.73 m(2), 20 mg every 12 h; and CLCR of 10 to 20 mi/min/1.73 m(2), 20 mg every 24 h. For subjects weig hing <60 kg, the proposed doses were 30, 15, and 15 mg, respectively, with the same dosing intervals specified above. In a second study (study II), 12 subjects with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis three times a week were enrolled in a randomized, open-label crossover study (dialysis 2 h after dosing and lasting 4 h or dosing without dialysis). There were no statistically significant differences for AUG(0-infinity), AUG(2-6), time t o maximum concentration of drug in serum, half-life, or apparent oral clear ance when the two treatment dosage regimens were compared. As a result of s tudy II, the recommended dosing rate for subjects requiring hemodialysis wa s the same as that proposed for those with severe renal impairment not requ iring hemodialysis; however, dosing was recommended to follow hemodialysis and to occur at the same time each day.