When high-quality conspecifics resemble heterospecifics, females may be una
ble to engage effectively in both species recognition (identification of co
nspecifics) and mate-quality recognition (identification of high-quality ma
tes). Consequently, females that engage primarily in mate-quality recogniti
on may risk heterospecific matings, and females that engage primarily in sp
ecies recognition may risk mating with low-quality mates. I examined the ev
olutionary consequences of this conflict between species and mate-quality r
ecognition in spadefoot toads, Spea multiplicata. I compared mate preferenc
es and the fitness consequences of these preferences in spadefoot toad popu
lations that did and did nor overlap with congeners. In non-overlapping pop
ulations, S. multiplicata females preferred an extreme call character resem
bling that of heterospecifics, and they had more eggs fertilized. In overla
pping populations, S. multiplicata females preferred those call characteris
tics that were closest to the norm for their population, and they did not r
eceive the benefit of enhanced fertilization success. Thus, S. multiplicata
females appear to trade off species and mate-quality recognition, such tha
t those cooccurring with heterospecifics forgo the benefits of high-quality
matings to ensure conspecific matings. These results suggest that the inte
raction between species and mate-quality recognition may influence mate cho
ice decisions in important and nonintuitive ways.