Development and validation of a method for simultaneous separation and quantification of 5 different sugars in canine urine

Citation
Jm. Steiner et al., Development and validation of a method for simultaneous separation and quantification of 5 different sugars in canine urine, CAN J VET R, 64(3), 2000, pp. 164-170
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE VETERINAIRE
ISSN journal
08309000 → ACNP
Volume
64
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
164 - 170
Database
ISI
SICI code
0830-9000(200007)64:3<164:DAVOAM>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The objective of this project was to develop and validate a method for conc urrent separation and quantification of methylglucose, rhamnose, xylose, su crose, and lactulose in canine urine by using high pressure anion exchange liquid chromatography and pulsed amperometric detection. The method was val idated by evaluating dilutional parallelism, spiking recovery, intra-assay variability, and inter-assay variability. Observed to expected ratios for 3 urine samples, and all sugars, ranged from 77.6% to 106.9% for a 1:2 dilut ion, 85.2% to 121.4% for a 1:4 dilution, and 91.6% to 163.7% for a 1:8 dilu tion. Observed to expected ratios for spiking recovery of 3 urine samples, all sugars, and 5 different spiking solutions, ranged from 85.5% to 116.7% (mean +/- SD, 100.5 +/- 6.0%). The intra-assay coefficients of variation we re 1.6%, 3.4%, and 4.7% for methylglucose; 1.6%, 2.0%, and 3.6% for rhamnos e; 2.7%, 1.4%, and 1.1% for xylose; 9.8%, 3.4%, and 4.0% for sucrose; and 3 .2%, 3.3%, and 3.3% for lactulose. Inter-assay coefficients of variation we re 3.2%, 5.7%, and 4.2% for methylglucose; 4.3%, 5.4%, and 6.4% for rhamnos e; 3.3%, 5.0%, and 4.2% for xylose; 9.4%, 9.9%, and 9.4% for sucrose; and 6 .1%, 4.9%, and 2.7% for lactulose. In conclusion, a method for simultaneous separation and quantification of 5 sugars in canine urine was established and found to be linear, accurate, precise, and reproducible. This method ma y prove useful in the simultaneous evaluation of gastric permeability, smal l intestinal permeability, and small intestinal mucosal function in dogs wi th gastrointestinal disorders.