Selective logging has been the main cause of disturbance to tropical forest
s in Southeast Asia, so the extent to which biodiversity is maintained in s
electively logged forest is of prime conservation importance. We compared t
he butterfly assemblages of Bornean primary rainforest to those of rainfore
st selectively logged 6 years previously. We sampled by means of replicated
transects stratified into riverine and ridge forests and we included roads
in the logged forest. There was a three-fold variation in species richness
and abundance over the 8-month sampling period. More species and individua
ls were observed in the logged forest, although between-replicate variabili
ty was high. Rarefied species richness was positively correlated with canop
y openness within the range of disturbance levels encountered at our forest
sites. Within families, there was no significant difference in the number
of species between primary and logged forest. There was a significant diffe
rence in the relative abundance of species, but this was due largely to the
abundance of one or two species. Community ordination separated the sites
along a gradient of disturbance and revealed strong differences between riv
erine and ridge-forest butterfly assemblages in primary forest that were ob
scured in logged forest. There was no evidence that logging has resulted in
a change in the composition of the butterfly assemblages from species with
a local distribution to more widespread species. We conclude that at a log
ged forest site in close proximity to primary forest, low intensities of lo
gging do not necessarily reduce the species richness or abundance of butter
flies, although assemblage composition is changed.