Endotracheal surfactant atomization: An alternative to bolus instillation?

Citation
Mh. Wagner et al., Endotracheal surfactant atomization: An alternative to bolus instillation?, CRIT CARE M, 28(7), 2000, pp. 2540-2544
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00903493 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2540 - 2544
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3493(200007)28:7<2540:ESAAAT>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effect of an intratracheal surfactant fog on oxygenation, blood pressure, distribution, and recovery rate as a pilot stu dy to intratracheal surfactant aerosol. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: University laboratory. Subjects: A total of 15 New Zealand White r abbits. Interventions: The anesthetized ventilated rabbits were surfactant-deprived by repeated lung lavages and then received 200 mg/kg of a Tc-99m-labeled p orcine surfactant (Curosurf) either as bolus or as intratracheal surfactant fog. Measurements and Main Results: Blood gases and pressure were measured and d istribution as well as recovery rate of the surfactant determined by means of the radio label (gamma camera images and lung processing with subsequent gamma counter measurements). Respiratory function normalized immediately, no difference could be found b etween the two groups with regard to pao Paco(2), and blood pressure. Even distribution of the radiolabel was found with both methods, the bolus group showing a higher percentage of lung pieces with label concentrations of do uble average or more. Recovery rates were 82.5% +/- 13.1% (mean +/- SD) in the bolus group and 86.5% +/- 7.7% in the fog group. Conclusion: Endotracheal surfactant fog application is as effective as bolu s instillation and may have a role in the treatment of adult respiratory di stress syndrome. It has to be considered as a first step in producing an ef fective aerosol.