Relationship of Pediatric Overall Performance Category and Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scores at pediatric intensive care unit discharge with outcome measures collected at hospital discharge and 1-and 6-month follow-up assessments
Dh. Fiser et al., Relationship of Pediatric Overall Performance Category and Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scores at pediatric intensive care unit discharge with outcome measures collected at hospital discharge and 1-and 6-month follow-up assessments, CRIT CARE M, 28(7), 2000, pp. 2616-2620
Objective: Given the current focus on outcomes, there is a crucial need for
easily utilized measures that can effectively quantify morbidity or disabi
lity after a child's critical illness or injury. The purpose of this study
is to significantly extend the research on two such promising measures: the
Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) and the Pediatric Cerebral P
erformance Category (PCPC),
Design: Cross-sectional analysis of a sample of pediatric intensive care un
it (PICU) discharges and a prospective follow-up of this cohort of children
.
Setting: Arkansas Children's Hospital.
Patients: Two hundred children (ranging in age from birth to 21 yrs) discha
rged from a PICU,
Interventions: None.
Measurements and Main Results: Data were collected at PICU discharge, hospi
tal discharge, and 1- and 6-month follow-up assessments after hospital disc
harge. Measures utilized included the PCPC (at PICU discharge), PCPC (at PI
CU discharge), Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, fourth edition (at hospit
al discharge), Bayley Scales of Infant Development, second edition (at hosp
ital discharge), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (at 1 and 6 mont
hs after discharge). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Quotients and Bayley Menta
l Developmental Index scores were significantly different across PCPC categ
ories (p < .0001), Bayley Psychomotor Developmental Index scores and Vinela
nd Adaptive Behavior Scales scores varied significantly across POPC categor
ies (p < .0001), The test for linear trend was also significant for each of
the comparisons.
Conclusions: The results of this study offer additional support for the use
of the PCPC and PCPC, These brief and easily completed measures can provid
e useful information regarding probable outcomes for pediatric intensive ca
re patients when more extensive psychometric testing is not feasible or des
irable.