Relationship of Pediatric Overall Performance Category and Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scores at pediatric intensive care unit discharge with outcome measures collected at hospital discharge and 1-and 6-month follow-up assessments

Citation
Dh. Fiser et al., Relationship of Pediatric Overall Performance Category and Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scores at pediatric intensive care unit discharge with outcome measures collected at hospital discharge and 1-and 6-month follow-up assessments, CRIT CARE M, 28(7), 2000, pp. 2616-2620
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00903493 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2616 - 2620
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3493(200007)28:7<2616:ROPOPC>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Objective: Given the current focus on outcomes, there is a crucial need for easily utilized measures that can effectively quantify morbidity or disabi lity after a child's critical illness or injury. The purpose of this study is to significantly extend the research on two such promising measures: the Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) and the Pediatric Cerebral P erformance Category (PCPC), Design: Cross-sectional analysis of a sample of pediatric intensive care un it (PICU) discharges and a prospective follow-up of this cohort of children . Setting: Arkansas Children's Hospital. Patients: Two hundred children (ranging in age from birth to 21 yrs) discha rged from a PICU, Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Data were collected at PICU discharge, hospi tal discharge, and 1- and 6-month follow-up assessments after hospital disc harge. Measures utilized included the PCPC (at PICU discharge), PCPC (at PI CU discharge), Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, fourth edition (at hospit al discharge), Bayley Scales of Infant Development, second edition (at hosp ital discharge), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (at 1 and 6 mont hs after discharge). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Quotients and Bayley Menta l Developmental Index scores were significantly different across PCPC categ ories (p < .0001), Bayley Psychomotor Developmental Index scores and Vinela nd Adaptive Behavior Scales scores varied significantly across POPC categor ies (p < .0001), The test for linear trend was also significant for each of the comparisons. Conclusions: The results of this study offer additional support for the use of the PCPC and PCPC, These brief and easily completed measures can provid e useful information regarding probable outcomes for pediatric intensive ca re patients when more extensive psychometric testing is not feasible or des irable.