The depth distribution of seismicity parameters estimated for the South American area

Authors
Citation
Tm. Tsapanos, The depth distribution of seismicity parameters estimated for the South American area, EARTH PLAN, 180(1-2), 2000, pp. 103-115
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
ISSN journal
0012821X → ACNP
Volume
180
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
103 - 115
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-821X(20000730)180:1-2<103:TDDOSP>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Two techniques are applied in order to estimate the seismicity parameters a nd their depth distribution in South America, an area of high seismic activ ity. These techniques are: (1) Gumbel's third asymptotic (GIII) distributio n of extremes and (2) the maximum likelihood approach. The obtained seismic ity parameters through GIII distribution of extremes, are the omega value w hich is considered as the upper bound magnitude and is related to the finit e maximum stresses and strains which are currently accumulated and released by the rocks, as earthquake, in a region, the shape parameter lambda, and the characteristic value u, with P(u) = 1/e and P(omega) = 1. The most prob able maximum magnitude, RM, of earthquakes for 95 years is also computed. T he seismicity parameters obtained by the application of the maximum likelih ood approach are the activity rate, lambda, of the seismic events, the mean return period, RP, of earthquakes above a cutoff magnitude M greater than or equal to m and the parameter b of the magnitude-frequency relation. The parameter beta which is related to b with b = beta log(10)(e), is also comp uted. The regional maximum magnitude, M-max (this is considered as the maxi mum possible magnitude in a specific region), is also provided under some c onstraints. Six depth-range subdivisions are defined for the examined area. All the seismicity parameters are computed and especially for GIII distrib ution a covariance analysis of its three parameters (omega, u and lambda) i s performed for each individual depth range. In all cases omega values are higher than the regional M-max estimates. The seismic activity rate decreas es with depth, while the beta parameter, which ranges between 1.18 to 2.06, does not show a clear regularity in its depth distribution. An important n otification is that the parameter lambda obtained by the two methods, expre sses totally different quantities. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All right s reserved.