Relationship between raindrop erosion and runoff erosion under simulated rainfall in the Sudano-Sahel: Consequences for the spread of nematodes by runoff
O. Planchon et al., Relationship between raindrop erosion and runoff erosion under simulated rainfall in the Sudano-Sahel: Consequences for the spread of nematodes by runoff, EARTH SURF, 25(7), 2000, pp. 729-741
This paper presents a rainfall simulation experiment carried out on three 5
0 m(2) plots in the Senegalese groundnut belt. One plot was not cultivated.
Groundnut and millet had previously been grown in the other two.
The experiment consisted of three rain events applied over 5 days at the en
d of the dry season. Erosion was monitored inside the plots by the use of a
relief meter and, at their outlets, by sampling the discharge. The number
of indigenous nematodes, and an exotic species introduced before the first
rain event, was monitored in the soil and in the discharge. This experiment
allows, for the first time, a set of simple hypotheses to be proposed to e
xplain the spread of nematodes by the runoff: raindrop impacts on the soil
surface set them in suspension; then, their low bulk density and their rela
tively large size do not allow them to settle when the raindrops shake the
water surface. Thus, nematodes follow the flow path where they are as far a
s its velocity remains significant. The biological aspects are decisive in
the mobility of nematodes, which can vary by a factor of 100 depending on t
he trophic groups. A very high raindrop erosion occurred during the experim
ent, up to 60 tons per hectare for the first rain event after hoeing. This
represents more than 40 per cent of the volume of soil previously moved by
soil work. The geometric properties of the plough, and their hydraulic cons
equences, appear very ephemeral. And yet these large movements of soil insi
de the plots are little related to the sediment load at the outlet, which f
ollows its own rules.
Analysis of the results indicates that the carrying capacity of the runoff
at the scale of 10 m(2), on gentle slopes ploughed perpendicular to the slo
pe, could not be directly calculable from the discharge. It could depend on
the history of past discharges because the shape of the flow paths, which
condition their carrying capacity, permanently interacts with the discharge
. These interactions could explain the great difficulties encountered by th
e erosion models in the case of low discharges on non-cohesive soils. Copyr
ight (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.