This study examined the frequency of use of various types of reliability co
efficients fora systematically drawn sample of 696 tests appearing in the A
PA-published Directory of Unpublished Experimental Mental Measures. Almost
all articles included some type of reliability report for at least one test
administration. Coefficient alpha was the overwhelming favorite among type
s of coefficients. Several measures treated almost universally in psycholog
ical-testing textbooks were rarely or never used. Problems encountered in t
he study included ambiguous designations of types of coefficients, reportin
g reliability based on a study other than the one cited, inadequate informa
tion about subscales, and simply incorrect recording of the information giv
en in an original source.