The term "background" is discussed and a definition is suggested to put an
end to the currently unsatisfying (non-)definition of geochemical or natura
l background. Based on the requirements stated in the definition, several s
imple and robust statistical methods are applied to different data sets (n>
50) from the atmosphere, pedosphere, and bisosphere in order to explore the
ir potential for the evaluation of a useful and robust background. Compared
with the original data set both the calculated distribution based upon the
lower 50% of the values, as well as a 2 sigma-approximation of the normali
sed data set lead to promising and realistic results. Both methods seem app
ropriate for a fast and reliable evaluation of likely upper limits of backg
round values. Nevertheless, even this robust method is not able to present
absolute and doubtlessly correct background values. True quantification of
any natural or geochemical background still requires a thorough investigati
on and is impossible without costly expert knowledge.