Prospective double-blind randomised study of a new regimen of pre-emptive analgesia for inguinal hernia repair: Evaluation of postoperative pain course
S. Fischer et al., Prospective double-blind randomised study of a new regimen of pre-emptive analgesia for inguinal hernia repair: Evaluation of postoperative pain course, EURO J SURG, 166(7), 2000, pp. 545-551
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a new regimen of pre-emptive an
algesia on the development of postoperative pain after inguinal hernia repa
ir.
Design: Prospective, double-blind, randomised study.
Setting: University Hospital, Germany.
Subjects: 70 consecutive patients who had primary unilateral inguinal herni
a repairs.
Interventions: A new regimen of pre-emptive analgesia with bupivacaine that
was infiltrated preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively was
tested. The control group were given saline infiltrations at the same times
. Pain was measured up to postoperative day 30 using the visual analogue sc
ale (VAS), the verbal rating scale (VRS), and by recording patient-controll
ed use of ibuprofen suppositories.
Results: Pain was significantly less in the pre-emptive analgesia group tha
n in the control group during the first 10 days postoperatively as assessed
by VAS and VRS (p < 0.05). Analgesic consumption was also significantly re
duced in the preemptive analgesia group (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis s
howed that bupivacaine infiltration (pre-emptive analgesia) was associated
with significantly less postoperative pain (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: This regimen of pre-emptive analgesia is an effective and safe
method of reducing postoperative pain and analgesic consumption after ingui
nal hernia repair.