Objectives.-To determine whether 347 patients would respond to a 50-mg oral
dose of sumatriptan, even though they considered themselves poor responder
s to this acute therapy for migraine, and to investigate whether oral narat
riptan can be an effective acute therapy for migraine in the subset of pati
ents who did not respond to sumatriptan under double-blind, well-controlled
conditions,
Background.-Although most migraineurs respond to sumatriptan, there remains
a need for an effective alternative for those who do not respond. Naratrip
tan is a more potent and more lipophilic member of this class of agent and
could prove beneficial in such patients. This is the first well-controlled
study to assess the value of another 5-HT1B/1D) agonist in this difficult p
atient subset.
Methods.-This study comprised two migraine attacks. The first (attack 1) wa
s a single-blind assessment of the efficacy of sumatriptan (50 mg orally) i
n patients with a history of poor response to the drug. The second (attack
2) was a randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
of naratriptan (2.5 mg orally) in nonresponders to oral sumatriptan.
Results.-Attack 1: About two thirds of this selected migraine population di
d not respond to sumatriptan. Attack 2: Naratriptan was statistically super
ior to placebo for headache relief at 2 hours and 4 hours, as well as for m
ost other features of migraine attacks. These data suggest an intrinsic eff
icacy of naratriptan in this patient subset and not a coincidental response
. No unexpected tolerability issues arose.
Conclusions.-Naratriptan is an alternative therapy for migraineurs who resp
ond poorly to oral sumatriptan. No response to one "triptan" does not neces
sarily predict no response to them all.