As a general group, long-lived perennial plants probably present the most c
hallenging obstacles to the researcher, breeder or propagator utilizing mic
roculture as a tool. These challenges appear during all stages of the micro
culture process, but are probably most resplendent during the stabilization
phase. What may be particularly frustrating is that much of this 'recalcit
rance' is genetically driven and is thus difficult to control by environmen
tal and nutritional manipulations in mitroculture. Perennials have complex
seasonal cycles and life cycles, which complicate control of their growth i
n microculture. As shoot cultures have provided useful tools for overcoming
these limitations, the inability to establish stabilized shoot cultures is
a major form of recalcitrance. Plants having seasonal growth dynamics domi
nated by strong episodic or determinant shoot growth are some of the most r
ecalcitrant species because stabilized shoot cultures cannot be readily gen
erated. In some cases, episodic growth may be tied closely to phase state a
nd can thus be controlled by manipulating phase; nevertheless, adequate con
trols have not been identified for many problematic plants. Another trait c
ontributing to recalcitrance of perennials is the relatively slow growth ra
te in microculture. Slow growth complicates such procedures as selection of
transformed tissues. The high phenolic content of many perennial tissues c
an interfere with the efficacy of transgenic traits such as beta-glucuronid
ase. Developmentally determined growth characteristics such as plagiotropis
m may persist through all stages of microculture and complicate the recover
y of commercially useful micropropagules. Although some technical approache
s can occasionally circumvent immediate microculture limitations. general s
olutions await the development of a deeper understanding of physiological b
ases of such genetically predetermined phenomena.