A rapidly growing literature claims to reject the efficient market hypothes
is by producing large estimates of long-term abnormal returns following maj
or corporate events. The preferred methodology in this literature is to cal
culate average multiyear buy-and-hold abnormal returns and conduct inferenc
es via a bootstrapping procedure. We show that this methodology is severely
flawed because it assumes independence of multiyear abnormal returns for e
vent firms, producing test statistics that are up to four times too large.
After accounting for the positive crosscorrelations of event-firm abnormal
returns, we find virtually no evidence of reliable abnormal performance for
our samples.