Malpractice occurrence in emergency medicine: Does residency training makea difference?

Citation
Sw. Branney et al., Malpractice occurrence in emergency medicine: Does residency training makea difference?, J EMERG MED, 19(2), 2000, pp. 99-105
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
07364679 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
99 - 105
Database
ISI
SICI code
0736-4679(200008)19:2<99:MOIEMD>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
We evaluated the effects of Emergency Medicine (EM) residency training, EM board certification, and physician experience on the occurrence of malpract ice claims and indemnity payments. This was a retrospective review of close d malpractice claims from a single insurer. Outcome measures included the o ccurrence of claims resulting in indemnity, indemnity amounts, and defense costs. Differences in the outcome measures were compared based on: EM resid ency training, EM board certification, EM residency training versus other r esidency training, and physician experience using both univariate and multi variate analyses. There were 428 closed EM claims with indemnity paid in 81 (18.9%), Indemnity was paid in 22.4% of closed claims against non-EM resid ency-trained physicians, and in only 13.3% against EM residency-trained phy sicians (p = 0.04). The total indemnity was $6,214,475. Non-EM trained phys icians accounted for $4,340,951 (71.5%), EM residency-trained physicians ac counted for $1,773,524 (28.5%), The average indemnity was $76,721 and the a verage defense cost was $17,775. There were no significant differences in t he mean indemnity paid per closed claim or the mean cost to defend a closed claim when comparing EM-trained and non-EM residency-trained physicians. T he total cost (indemnity + defense costs) per physician-year of malpractice coverage was $4,905 for non-EM residency-trained physicians and $2,212 for EM residency-trained physicians. EM residency-trained physicians account f or significantly less malpractice indemnity than non-EM residency-trained p hysicians. This difference is not due to differences in the average indemni ty but is due to significantly fewer closed claims against EM residency-tra ined physicians with indemnity paid. This results in a cost per physician-y ear of malpractice coverage for non-EM residency-trained physicians that is over twice that of EM residency-rained physicians. (C) 2000 Elsevier Scien ce Inc.