Three dual-task experiments were conducted to examine whether the underaddi
tive interaction of the Simon effect and stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) on
Task 2 performance is due to decay. The experiments tested whether the rev
erse Simon effect obtained with an incompatible stimulus-response (S-R) map
ping would show an overadditive interaction with SOA, as predicted by R. De
Jong, C.-C. Liang, and E. Lauber's (1994) dual-process model. Tone or lett
er identification tasks with vocal or keypress responses were used as Task
1. Task 2 was keypresses to arrow direction (or letter identity in Experime
nt i). For all experiments, the normal Simon effect showed an underadditive
interaction with SOA, but the reverse Simon effect did not show an overadd
itive interaction. The results imply that the dual-process model is not app
licable to the dual-task context. Multiple correspondence effects across ta
sks implicate an explanation in terms of automatic S-R translation.