Cj. Atkinson et al., Interactions between root restriction, irrigation and rootstock treatmentson 'Queen Cox' apple trees: Effects of soil and plant water relations, J HORT SCI, 75(4), 2000, pp. 376-382
The purpose of this research was to determine if established, orchard-grown
apple trees that were confined in root-restricting membranes received adeq
uate water for growth when irrigated. Previous data had shown positive effe
cts of root restriction on reducing shoot extension growth in apple. Soil m
atric potential (Psi(sm)). leaf stomatal conductance (g) and leaf water pot
entials (Psi(1)) were measured over daily cycles during the period of maxim
um tree water use (July and August). Measurements were also made of the Psi
(sm) and fruit size throughout the growing season. Daily and seasonal Psi(s
m) showed that the soil within the root restricting membranes (+R) when irr
igated (+I) remained closed to field capacity (<100 HPa), which was not the
case for unirrigated soil within the membranes (-I +R). Psi(1) measured be
fore dawn, showed that similar levels of drought stress were evident betwee
n irrigated and restricted (+I +R) and unrestricted (+I -R and -I -R) trees
. The Psi(sm), and Psi(1) for trees with roots within restricting membranes
were significantly more negative, in the absence of irrigation (-I +R). Me
asurement of g showed that root restricted trees were transpiring at simila
r rates in the presence of irrigation (+I +R) as unrestricted trees (+I -R)
with or without irrigation. Stomatal closure could not explain the increas
ed Psi(1) observed for the restricted irrigated (+I +R) treatment compared
with unrestricted (-R) trees. A reduced stomatal aperture was the most like
ly explanation for the reduction in growth previously observed with the res
tricted unirrigated trees. Fruit size was also affected by root restriction
and the effect became greater as the roots became more restricted with tre
e age. Similarly, there was also a negative effect, in one year, of root re
striction on fruit size at harvest, even in the presence of irrigation. Dat
a show that reductions in soil water availability, Psi(1) and g, for the ro
ot-restricted trees (+I +R), were unlikely to be the causes for the previou
sly observed reductions in shoot growth (tree size). These results imply th
at other factors were in operation, among which root-synthesized chemical r
egulators of shoot growth are the most likely candidates.