Gut focused behavioural treatment (biofeedback) for constipation and faecal incontinence in multiple sclerosis

Citation
Ph. Wiesel et al., Gut focused behavioural treatment (biofeedback) for constipation and faecal incontinence in multiple sclerosis, J NE NE PSY, 69(2), 2000, pp. 240-243
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY
ISSN journal
00223050 → ACNP
Volume
69
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
240 - 243
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3050(200008)69:2<240:GFBT(F>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Objectives-To determine whether gut focused behavioural treatment (biofeedb ack) is a useful therapy in multiple sclerosis patients referred for consti pation, incontinence, or a combination of these symptoms. Most patients wit h multiple sclerosis complain of constipation, faecal incontinence, or a co mbination of the two. Patients rate these bowel symptoms as having a major impact on their life. Until now the management of these problems has been e mpirical, with a lack of evaluated therapeutic regimes. Methods-Thirteen patients (eight women, median age 38 years, median duratio n of multiple sclerosis 10 years) complaining of constipation, with or with out faecal incontinence underwent a median of four sessions of behavioural treatment. Anorectal physiological tests were performed before therapy. Imp airment and disability were rated with the Kurtzke score and the Cambridge multiple sclerosis basic score (CAMBS). Patients were contacted a median of 14 months after completion of treatment. Results-A beneficial effect was attributed to biofeedback in five patients. Mild to moderate disability, quiescent and non-relapsing disease, and abse nce of progression of multiple sclerosis over the year before biofeedback w ere predictive of symptom improvement. No physiological test predicted the response to therapy. Conclusion-Biofeedback retraining is an effective treatment in some patient s with multiple sclerosis complaining of constipation or faecal incontinenc e. A response is more likely in patients with limited disability and a non- progressive disease course.