Cattle prefer endophyte-free robust needlegrass

Citation
Ta. Jones et al., Cattle prefer endophyte-free robust needlegrass, J RANGE MAN, 53(4), 2000, pp. 427-431
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT
ISSN journal
0022409X → ACNP
Volume
53
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
427 - 431
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-409X(200007)53:4<427:CPERN>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Robust needlegrass (Achnatherum robustum [Vasey] Barkw Stipa robusta [Vasey ] Scribn,) is a high-biomass rangeland species that is adapted to warmer te mperatures and matures later than most cool-season grasses. However, it has been associated with negative animal effects including avoidance. We compa red populations of Neotyphodium and P-endophyte-infected endophyte-infected (E+) and endophyte-free (E-) robust needlegrass for animal preference. Lea f blades were fed to yearling heifers in 3 trials of 8-min cafeteria sessio ns for 4 to 5 days each. Trial 1 (27-30 May) compared E+, E-, basin wildrye (Leymus cinereus [Scribn, & Merr,] A. Love), and tall wheatgrass (Thinopyr um ponticum [Podp.] Barkw, & D.R. Dewey). Basin wildrye consumption (425 g) did not differ from tall wheatgrass (342 g), but basin wildrye consumption exceeded E- (258 g), which in turn exceeded E+ (117 g) (16 animal-sessions ). Basin wildrye was dropped from Trial 2 because its consumption exceeded that of both E- and E+. In Trial 2 (1-5 June), consumption of E-, E+, and t all wheatgrass did not differ, Tall wheatgrass was dropped from Trial 3 to allow direct comparison of E- and E+, In Trial 3 (13-17 July), consumption of E- (585 g) exceeded E+ (145 g) (15 animal-sessions). In Trial 3, animals often rejected E+ forage before tasting. Discrimination against E+ was gre ater at the end of Trial 3 than at the beginning. The reputation of robust needlegrass for animal avoidance may be more related to its endophyte infec tion status than to the grass itself. Differences in forage-quality paramet ers were not Large enough to account for the observed differences in prefer ence. Ergot and loline alkaloids were not found in either E- or E+, therefo re they cannot be responsible for the observed avoidance of E+. Non-trace a mounts of ergot alkaloids were found only in seed collected in the Sacramen to Mountains of New Mexico and not at other locations in New Mexico, Arizon a, or Colorado.