Economics of grazing weeping lovegrass with stockers in the Southern GreatPlains

Citation
La. Torell et al., Economics of grazing weeping lovegrass with stockers in the Southern GreatPlains, J RANGE MAN, 53(3), 2000, pp. 268-276
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT
ISSN journal
0022409X → ACNP
Volume
53
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
268 - 276
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-409X(200005)53:3<268:EOGWLW>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Because of the relatively low cost of seed and ease of establishment, more than 0.4 million ha of weeping lovegrass (Eragrostis curvula (Shrad.) Nees. ) were planted on Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands in the Southern High Plains. Dryland cropping alternatives including wheat and grain sorghu m, give relatively low and variable economic returns. The objective of this study was to evaluate the economics of the lovegrass grazing alternative. Using a tract of weeping lovegrass in Curry County, N.M., animal performanc e and the economics of 5 grazing management treatments were evaluated, incl uding 12-month and 6-month continuous grazing, seasonal grazing during only the spring and fall, and a 6-pasture rotation system. Fertilization of the pastures was also evaluated for the spring/fall grazing treatment. Average daily gain (ADG) for yearlings grazing weeping lovegrass pastures was foun d to decline rapidly as the grazing season progressed. The ADG was over 1.3 6 kg day(-1) in early May but gradually declined over the grazing season to less than 0.45 kg day(-1) by the end of August. To maximize profit, stocke r cattle would be sold in early September. All of the grazing systems yield ed similar net economic returns, but substantially higher economic returns could be made by adjusting stocking rates to market conditions. Returning C RP land to dryland cropping or grazing with stocker cattle was estimated to yield nearly identical economic returns. Neither growing traditional crops or grazing lovegrass pastures appear to be economically viable alternative s without government assistance programs in place.