Because of the relatively low cost of seed and ease of establishment, more
than 0.4 million ha of weeping lovegrass (Eragrostis curvula (Shrad.) Nees.
) were planted on Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands in the Southern
High Plains. Dryland cropping alternatives including wheat and grain sorghu
m, give relatively low and variable economic returns. The objective of this
study was to evaluate the economics of the lovegrass grazing alternative.
Using a tract of weeping lovegrass in Curry County, N.M., animal performanc
e and the economics of 5 grazing management treatments were evaluated, incl
uding 12-month and 6-month continuous grazing, seasonal grazing during only
the spring and fall, and a 6-pasture rotation system. Fertilization of the
pastures was also evaluated for the spring/fall grazing treatment. Average
daily gain (ADG) for yearlings grazing weeping lovegrass pastures was foun
d to decline rapidly as the grazing season progressed. The ADG was over 1.3
6 kg day(-1) in early May but gradually declined over the grazing season to
less than 0.45 kg day(-1) by the end of August. To maximize profit, stocke
r cattle would be sold in early September. All of the grazing systems yield
ed similar net economic returns, but substantially higher economic returns
could be made by adjusting stocking rates to market conditions. Returning C
RP land to dryland cropping or grazing with stocker cattle was estimated to
yield nearly identical economic returns. Neither growing traditional crops
or grazing lovegrass pastures appear to be economically viable alternative
s without government assistance programs in place.