Accurate measures of the relative resource impacts from elk (Cervus elaphus
) and cattle (Bos taurus and B. indicus) improve land management planning w
herever these species cohabitate. Comparisons of utilization inside and out
side cattle exclosures are often used for this purpose. The objectives of o
ur study were to determine if (1) elk presence differed inside and adjacent
to several different-sized cattle exclosures; (2) there was a relationship
between cattle exclosure size and elk presence in exclosures; and (3) a mi
nimum cattle exclosure size is appropriate for assessing elk impacts. Seven
different-sized cattle exclosures (4.00, 2.00, 1.00, 0.50, 0.25, 0.10, and
0.05 ha) were compared in western Montana during the spring of 1996 and 19
97. Trackplots (1-m(2) areas cleared of vegetation) were used to detect elk
presence. Chi-square tests indicated elk presence inside all exclosures wa
s less (P < 0.10) than elk presence adjacent to the exclosures. Regression
analysis indicated exclosure size and elk presence were correlated (P < 0.0
3). Elk presence inside exclosures increased with increasing exclosure size
. Our results did not support the minimum exclosure size (0.4 ha) recommend
ed in the literature. Cattle exclosures larger than 4 ha appear needed to a
ccurately measure relative resource impacts from elk and cattle; however, t
his does not ensure that an exclosure > 4.0 ha in size will solve all of th
e problems associated with this technique.