The purpose of this study is to report our initial experience with the use
of spring coils to close the patent ductus arteriosus in the dog. There are
few large-patient series reported in the veterinary literature. Coil closu
re was attempted in 15 dogs (median weight, 6.5 kg; range, 1.2 to 38.7 kg)
presenting with a potent ductus arteriosus between May 1997 and May 1999. A
rterial catheterization followed by angiography was used to decide if coil
placement was adequate. A 5- or 8-mm embolization coil depending on the ang
iographic diameter of the ductus, was delivered, with 1 loop in the pulmona
ry arterial side and the remainder of the coil in the aortic side of the du
ct. Additional coils were used if a residual shunt was present, and closure
was confirmed by aortography. Patients were discharged the day after the p
rocedure. Successful coil closure, without residual shunt on angiography, w
as achieved in 11 of 13 dogs in which coils were released. In 6 dogs, a coi
l embolized to the pulmonary artery. Four of these dogs had successful clos
ure with multiple coils, and 2 others had surgery. None of these dogs exper
ienced adverse effects. in 2 dogs with conical patent ductus arteriosus >5
mm in minimal diameter, coil closure was not done. We conclude that the pat
ent ductus arteriosus size and anatomical shape are crucial in deciding whe
ther coil closure is the method of choice. In selected cases, coil closure
represents an elegant alternative to surgical Ligation. Although pulmonary
embolism occurred commonly, it did not cause any obvious clinical problem.