Objectives - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of time-l
imited prescriptions on the delivery of antibiotics in a university hospita
l.
Methods - In January 1998, we introduced a policy of time-limited prescript
ion for selected antibiotics. Each prescription was limited to four days fo
r empirical prescription and to seven days for documented infections. intra
venous antibiotics subject to restriction were: amikacin, cefepime, sulbact
am, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, fosfomycin, fusidic acid, ofloxacine, piper
acilline, teicoplanin, tazocilline, imipenem, fluconazole, and vancomycin.
Prescriptions were delivered only upon presentation of a pre-printed form s
igned by a senior physician. Restricted antibiotic consumption data were su
rveyed monthly Other antibiotics were surveyed yearly. Antibiotic use was m
easured daily and expressed per 100 hospitalization days.
Results - In-hospital activity increased by 1.9% for hospitalization days,
and by 5.1% for admissions from 1997 to 1998. A 17.7% decrease of restricte
d antibiotics and a 3% increase of nonrestricted antibiotics was observed A
decrease in restricted antibiotics was balanced by an increase of non-rest
ricted drugs of the same class. However; a 1.6% decrease of doses was obser
ved The part of the budget dedicated to antibiotics decreased by 74%, and t
he antibiotic cost per admission decreased by 11.9%.
Conclusion - Quality of care did not seem affected as in-hospital length of
stay and mortality were similar in both periods. Follow-up was not importa
nt enough to demonstrate an effect of this policy on the isolation of drug
resistant microorganisms. This study suggests that a simple, non-coercive m
ethod can reduce the use of antibiotics in hospitals. (C) 1999 Editions sci
entifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.