The disease commonly known as "dandruff" is caused by numerous host factors
in conjunction with the normal flora yeast Malassezia furfur (Pityrosporum
ovale). Indeed, clinical studies have shown that administration of antifun
gal agents correlates with an improved clinical condition. Almost all comme
rcially available hair shampoos publicize that they contain some form of an
tifungal agent(s). However, few studies have been published in which antifu
ngal activity of commercially available hair shampoos have been contrasted
experimentally. In this study six commercially available shampoos (in the P
hilippines) were assessed for antifungal activity against a human (dandruff
) isolate of M. furfur: (a) Head & Shoulders (Proctor & Gamble); (b) Gard V
iolet (Colgate-Palmolive); (c) Nizoral 1% (Janssen); (d) Nizoral 2% (Jansse
n); (e) Pantene Blue (Proctor & Gamble); and (f) Selsun Blue (Abbott). The
results demonstrated that all six of the assayed hair shampoos have some an
tifungal effect on the test yeast. However, there was consider variation in
potency of antifungal activity. Nizoral 1% and Nizoral 2% shampoo preparat
ions were the most effective. The 1% Nizoral shampoo was consistently 10X b
etter at killing yeast cells than the next closest rival shampoo. The 2% Ni
zoral shampoo was 10X better than the Nizoral 1% product and 100 times bett
er than any of the other products assayed. The study demonstrated that sham
poos containing a proven antifungal compound were the most effective in con
trolling the causative yeast.