The dissociation between object identity and object orientation observed in
six patients with brain damage, has been taken as evidence for a view-inva
riant model of object recognition. However, there was also some indication
that these patients were not generally agnosic for object orientation but w
ere able to gain access to at least some information about objects' canonic
al upright. We studied a new case (KB) with spared knowledge of object iden
tity and impaired perception of object orientation using a Forced choice pa
radigm to contrast directly the patient's ability to perceive objects' cano
nical upright vs non-upright orientations. We presented 2D-pictures of obje
cts with unambiguous canonical upright orientations in four different orien
tations (0 degrees, -90 degrees, +90 degrees, 180 degrees). KB showed no im
pairment in identifying letters, objects, animals, or faces irrespective of
their given orientation. Also, her knowledge of upright orientation of sti
muli was perfectly preserved. In sharp contrast, KB was not able to judge t
he orientation when the stimuli were presented in a non-upright orientation
. The findings give further support for a distributed view-based representa
tion of objects in which neurons become tuned to the features present in ce
rtain views of an object. Since we see more upright than inverted animals a
nd familiar objects, the statistics of these images leads to a larger numbe
r of neurons tuned for objects in an upright orientation. We suppose that p
robably for this reason KB's knowledge of upright orientation was found to
be more robust against neuronal damage than knowledge of other orientations
, (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.