Selective impairment in recognition of faces (prosopagnosia) has been advan
ced as an argument for a brain module dedicated to face processing and focu
sing on the specific configural properties of faces. Loss of the inversion
effect supposedly strengthened the argument ([10]: de Gelder B, Bachoud-Lev
i AC, Degos JD. Inversion superiority in visual agnosia may be common to a
variety of orientation polarised objects besides faces. Vision Research, 19
98;38:2855-61; [20]: Farah MJ, Wilson K, Drain H, Tanaka J. The inverted fa
ce inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific
perceptual mechanisms. Vision Research 1995b;35:2089-93). The present stud
y of prosopagnosic patient LH reports that he has lost the normal pattern o
f superior performance with upright faces and objects and shows instead par
adoxical inversion effect for faces but also for objects. Experiment 2 inve
stigated whether LH's use of features based route for processing upright ob
jects would be hindered by the whole-based encoding when processing upright
objects. The data show the same context effect for objects as was found fo
r faces. Therefore the inversion effect does not present decisive evidence
for the existence of a face module. Moreover, the importance of configurati
on-based recognition known to be crucial for face processing, must also be
taken seriously for object recognition. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All
rights reserved.