Comparative regeneration ecology of three leguminous timber species in a Bolivian tropical dry forest

Citation
Ts. Fredericksen et al., Comparative regeneration ecology of three leguminous timber species in a Bolivian tropical dry forest, NEW FOREST, 20(1), 2000, pp. 45-64
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
NEW FORESTS
ISSN journal
01694286 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
45 - 64
Database
ISI
SICI code
0169-4286(200007)20:1<45:CREOTL>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
A comparative study of the regeneration ecology of three lesser-known legum inous timber species was conducted in the seasonally dry forests of Santa C ruz, Bolivia to determine species regeneration strategies and make silvicul tural recommendations for these species. The study included a representativ e from each subfamily of Leguminosae: Anadenanthera colubrina (Vell. Conc.) Benth. (Mimosaceae), Copaifera chodatiana Kunth. (Caesalpinaceae), and Cen trolobium microchaete C. Martius (Fabaceae). After production in the mid-la te dry season, seeds of all species suffered high (> 30%) rates of predatio n. For seeds surviving predation, Anadenanthera germinated within three day s after the first rains and a high germination capacity (82%), but most see dlings died from inadequate light or during subsequent periods of drought. Copaifera germinated more slowly but had high germination capacity (85%). C entrolobium had very low germination capacity (4%) and germinative energy. Most successful regeneration of Centrolobium occurred via sprouting from da maged roots on or near logging roads where it had a density of 261 root spr outs/ha. Anadenanthera regenerated best from seed in areas with soil distur bance or burning. The regeneration of these species will likely increase un der more intensive logging and/or post-harvest competition control treatmen ts in logging gaps. The more shade-tolerant Copaifera is most suited to the current regime of light selective logging, but all three species are likel y to be responsive to post-harvest competition control treatments. Impacts of controlled and natural fire were mixed, but generally seedling regenerat ion and growth were either not significantly affected or were increased by fire.