Mycobacterium avium complex disease (MAC) in HIV patients: incidence and risk factors before and after HAART.

Citation
M. Mary-krause et al., Mycobacterium avium complex disease (MAC) in HIV patients: incidence and risk factors before and after HAART., PATH BIOL, 48(5), 2000, pp. 495-504
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
PATHOLOGIE BIOLOGIE
ISSN journal
03698114 → ACNP
Volume
48
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
495 - 504
Database
ISI
SICI code
0369-8114(200006)48:5<495:MACD(I>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the risk factors of the first occurrence of Mycobacterium avium complex disease (MAC) infection among hum an immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects during two different time periods: before and after the introduction of protease inhibitor (respecti vely, period 1: 1 January 1992 to 31 December 1995, and period 2: 1 January 1996 to 30 June 1998). This study was performed using the French Hospital Database on HIV(FHDH). Subjects were included when their CD4(+) cell count was less than 100/mm(3). If they did not die or develop MAC within the firs t 6 months after the inclusion, their follow-up had to be longer than 6 mon ths to be included. Cox's model was used to calculated the relative hazards (RH) of MAC occurrence according to the age and time-dependent variables, such as CD4+ below 50/mm(3), previous occurrence of tuberculosis, cytomegal ovirus (CMV) infection and other acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)- defining disease, nature of antiretroviral treatment and MAC prophylaxis. A mong the 14,779 subjects followed during period 1, 1,710 (11.6%) had a diag nosis of MAC infection during their follow-up (incidence: 8.4 +/- 0.2 for 1 00 persons per year), while only 453 (4.4%) among 10,239 subjects presented this infection during period 2 (2.8 +/- 0,1 for 100 persons per year). Rif abutin regular prescription was a protective factor of MAC occurrence durin g period 1 (RH = 0.51 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.37-0.69]), whereas this protective effect was not observed during period 2 (RH = 1.05 CI = [0. 63-1.67]). Thus, during the HAART period, the results that we present do no t indicate an interest into continuing MAC prophylaxis. (C) 2000 Editions s cientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.