Ca. Marra et al., A new ciprofloxacin stepdown program in the treatment of high-risk febrileneutropenia: A clinical and economic analysis, PHARMACOTHE, 20(8), 2000, pp. 933-942
Study Objective. To determine treatment outcomes and economic impact of a c
iprofloxacin stepdown program for high-risk febrile neutropenic adults from
the hospital's perspective.
Design. Unblinded, two-phase, single-center study.
Setting. Adult leukemia and stem cell transplant unit.
Patients. High-risk adults with febrile neutropenia.
Intervention. Two conditions were analyzed: a multidisciplinary ciprofloxac
in stepdown program involving a reduction in parenteral ciprofloxacin dose
from 400 to 200 mg (i.v.-i.v.) and conversion to oral ciprofloxacin (i.v.-p
.o.) when criteria were met; and no i.v.-i.v. stepdown program.
Measurements and Main Results. Forty-six sequential treatment courses were
compared with 42 treatment course from 6-month periods in preintervention (
P1) and postintervention (P2) phases. Assessed parameters were clinical and
microbiologic outcomes, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and direct medical
resource use and costs (1998 $Canadian) for the episode of febrile neutrope
nia. A decision analytic model was used to map probabilities and costs and
to conduct sensitivity analyses. To supplement standard statistical testing
, 1000 bootstrap samples were created, and the mean cost difference was cal
culated between phases for each sample. Patient demographics, percentage i.
v.-p.o. stepdown, and duration of therapy were similar between phases. Clin
ical success (83% P1, 81% P2), microbiologic eradication (15% P1, 24% P2),
and possible ADRs (6% P1, 9% P2) did not differ. Intravenous-to-intravenous
dose stepdown occurred in 33% of P2 and no P1 treatment courses (p<0.001).
Resource use and costs were similar between phases, although a reduction w
as seen in the drug's mean total cost/day ($58 P1, $52 P2, p=0.04). There w
as also a trend toward a decrease in mean total treatment costs ($4843 P1,
$3493 P2, p=0.08). In 1000 bootstrap samples, 99.8% showed a cost advantage
for P2. The model was robust to sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion. This intervention influenced administration of ciprofloxacin wi
thout apparent compromise of patient outcomes and resulted in a reduction i
n total costs of treating febrile neutropenia.