In environmental sociology three strands of nature conceptualization can be
distinguished: the resource, the 'Arcadian' and the constructionist approa
ch. In the resource approach, the instrumental values of nature as a susten
ance base are central, and social theory focuses on the way society can be
geared to the conditions of sustainability as they are determined by natura
l science. In the 'Arcadian' approach, non-instrumental, aesthetic and ethi
cal values are central, and social theory focuses primarily on the defense
of these values. In the constructionist approach the values of nature, whet
her instrumental or non-instrumental, are investigated and criticized as so
cial constructions. The article offers a tentative framework for bridging t
he gap between constructionism and the other nature approaches. As far as n
oninstrumental nature valuation is concerned, this framework puts an emphas
is on lifeworld experiences of nature.